This time, TEPCO signalled well in advance that it would NOT apply for a restart of the reactors before "gaining the understanding" of Niigata Prefecture. Also, a flurry of press stories has reported in recent days on TEPCO's dismal finances, the pressure from its banks and bondholders, and the importance of a reactor restart as part of its financial rehabilitation plan.
Instead of a shouting match, the Governor asked why Niigata should trust TEPCO to do things any differently than in the past. TEPCO President Hirose mumbled something about TEPCO being "reborn" ("Shinsei TEPCO") and having taken the Government's money, ... then pointed out that TEPCO is now planning to install extremely expensive filtered vents that would allow venting of the reactor buildings without release of significant radioactive materials. Had these vents been in place at Fukushima Dai-ichi, TEPCO would have vented the buildings and avoided the hydrogen buildup which contributed to the problems there -- at least the most visible sign of catastrophe, with hydrogen explosions sending radioactive material high into the atmosphere.
(The K-K 6 and 7 reactors are relatively new, commissioned in 1996 and 1997, respectively, and are "advanced boiling water reactors." The other reactors at K-K were commissioned between 1985 and 1994 -- also nowhere near as old as Fukushima Dai-ichi 1 and 2, but there are concerns about potential earthquake faults on site that run directly under or very near reactors 1-5 and their turbine buildings. The K-K complex suffered various types of damage in a 2007 earthquake and the first of its reactors did not reopen until 2 years later. Also, estimates of earthquake intensity from nearby faults has been increased significantly in the post-2011 reassessment, so it is not clear that the current designs would be sufficient, even absent the on-site faults.)
NHK followed this theme (based on talking points from the central government and TEPCO?) and indicated that reopening the K-K 6 and 7 reactors could add billions to TEPCO's bottom line annually (the NHK report said 240 to 350 billion yen -- 2.4 to 3.5 billion dollars -- annually), helping to avoid another rate increase, more government bailout money, etc.
A story in this morning (Thursday's) Nikkei reports that TEPCO has a refinancing of some debt approaching this autumn, and the financial institutions are indicating that in order to participate they will significantly increase the interest rate charged unless either (1) TEPCO has applied for a restart of K-K 6&7 reactors, or (2) TEPCO has further increased its electricity rate. The TEPCO management is bending over backwards to try to avoid another rate increase so quickly after its 2012 increase, and so has everything riding on a restart of the reactors.
To put this in perspective, the K-K reactors 6 and 7 each have maximum power output of 1315MW. Even if they do restart in the next year or two, after very expensive upgrades, TEPCO is very unlikely to achieve a restart of any of the rest of its reactors over that time-frame. TEPCO's pre-March 2011 nuclear reactors consisted of:
1. 2812MW -- Reactors 1 to 4 at Fukushima Dai-ichi. These were catastrophically damaged and will be a burden for many decades and, of course, never restart.
2. 1884MW -- Reactors 5 and 6 at Fukushima Dai-ichi. These were not damaged, but are on the same site and will be decommissioned. Prime Minister Abe officially requested earlier this month that TEPCO decommission these.
3. 4400MW -- Fukushima Dai-Ni reactors 1 to 4. This facility is down the coast 20-25 kms from Fukushima Dai-Ichi. It is highly likely these will never be restarted.
4. 8212MW -- Kashiwazaki-Kariwa (or Kariba) reactors 1 to 7. Again, the restart of reactors 6 and 7 remains very uncertain and very expensive, while reactors 1 to 5 have additional problems and earthquake concerns that will make them more difficult, if not impossible, to restart.
So out of the total nameplate capacity of 17.3GW of nuclear generation, TEPCO is working toward a possible restart of 2.63GW -- just 15% of the total.
The TEPCO restructuring problem was the subject of an analysis piece in Nikkei Wednesday morning as well, by Chuo University law professor Junji Annen. Prof. Annen notes that TEPCO has ultimate compensation obligations from the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident of between 5 and 10 trillion yen, that the nuclear compensation body has provided 4 trillion yen (40 billion dollars) of funding (3 trillion of grants/subsidies and 1 trillion yen of capital); that TEPCO raised rates significantly; and yet TEPCO still had an aggregate loss of 700 billion yen (>$7 billion) for the two years ended March 31, 2013. The loss was recorded despite TEPCO's ability to book the 3 trillion yen (>$30 billion) of the government subsidies as extraordinary income, so the actual situation is far, far worse. Prof. Annen notes that both a cap on TEPCO compensation obligations (as opposed to government clean-up efforts) AND a reactor restart at K-K are essential for TEPCO's near-term survival, while the longer-term solution will involve some kind of restructuring that divides TEPCO into a "good" and "bad" company. The "good" company will be freed of impossible burdens, but would pay a share of its profit to fund the "bad" company and meet a portion of such obligations.
UPDATE: One day after this post, the Niigata government has given TEPCO its "conditional" support for TEPCO to at least proceed with filing its application with respect to K-K reactors 6 and 7. The prefecture has apparently taken the view that this is not a "final" approval, which will be subject to satisfaction on various safety issues, but only a nod to allow TEPCO to make its filing.
By Friday, the group of all major (and some minor) Japanese banks that faced an upcoming TEPCO refinancing had indicated that, given the restart application for K-K reactors 6 & 7, they would NOT require TEPCO to file for a rate increase and, at least tentatively, that they plan to participate in the refinancing.
On Saturday, the 28th, TEPCO's President was interviewed by Nikkei Shimbun and stated that, in light of the prospect that these reactors might be operating in 2014, TEPCO plans to announce a restructuring plan later this year that would not include further rate increases, and hopes to avoid a loss for the fiscal year that ends March 31, 2014.
A look at TEPCO's implementation of its current restructuring plan does not offer high hopes.
The current plan had proposed restarting K-K reactors 6 & 7 by April, 2013, six months ago. It also contemplated decommissioning only Fukushima Dai-ichi Reactors 1 through 4, whereas now 5 and 6 also must be decommissioned. Now, TEPCO hopes to squeeze out additional 10-year cost reductions of 140 billion yen, following its current plan of 336 billion yen in reductions. And TEPCO also plans to establish an arm to participate in deregulated portions of the electricity market, as Chubu Electric and Kansai Electric also have announced. Maybe TEPCO will be able to reduce customer outflow if it "counterattacks" in the home regions of other utilities?
We should know before too long if the hope for a profit in the current TEPCO fiscal year is more "happy talk" to support Abenomics and improve the economic mood--a thank you present for well-orchestrated government support to bring Niigata's governor and the financial institutions into line for the time being--or if it can actually be achieved (and, if so, whether it involves the same kind of accounting magic that limited the last two years' losses to 700 billion yen).
UPDATE: Reuters had a good article today (October 7, 2013) on the TEPCO turnaround effort -- the public relations and the reality. As one analyst indicates, "it's all kabuki ... It's very much an orchestrated presentation". I hope my blog post gives some sense of the way these things are done in Japan, at least at the public level.
Also the Yomiuri mentions that the LDP is now seriously considering a "good bank bad bank" approach to TEPCO, hiving off the legacy problem of decommissioning its reactors and dealing with the Fukushima mess. Since TEPCO does not have the resources to deal with its legacy issues, this is perhaps inevitable. But if and only if it is done in a manner that ensures the "good TEPCO" will move forward faithfully to implement a competitive market in electricity, including separation of generation, transmission and distribution.
UPDATE: One day after this post, the Niigata government has given TEPCO its "conditional" support for TEPCO to at least proceed with filing its application with respect to K-K reactors 6 and 7. The prefecture has apparently taken the view that this is not a "final" approval, which will be subject to satisfaction on various safety issues, but only a nod to allow TEPCO to make its filing.
By Friday, the group of all major (and some minor) Japanese banks that faced an upcoming TEPCO refinancing had indicated that, given the restart application for K-K reactors 6 & 7, they would NOT require TEPCO to file for a rate increase and, at least tentatively, that they plan to participate in the refinancing.
On Saturday, the 28th, TEPCO's President was interviewed by Nikkei Shimbun and stated that, in light of the prospect that these reactors might be operating in 2014, TEPCO plans to announce a restructuring plan later this year that would not include further rate increases, and hopes to avoid a loss for the fiscal year that ends March 31, 2014.
A look at TEPCO's implementation of its current restructuring plan does not offer high hopes.
The current plan had proposed restarting K-K reactors 6 & 7 by April, 2013, six months ago. It also contemplated decommissioning only Fukushima Dai-ichi Reactors 1 through 4, whereas now 5 and 6 also must be decommissioned. Now, TEPCO hopes to squeeze out additional 10-year cost reductions of 140 billion yen, following its current plan of 336 billion yen in reductions. And TEPCO also plans to establish an arm to participate in deregulated portions of the electricity market, as Chubu Electric and Kansai Electric also have announced. Maybe TEPCO will be able to reduce customer outflow if it "counterattacks" in the home regions of other utilities?
We should know before too long if the hope for a profit in the current TEPCO fiscal year is more "happy talk" to support Abenomics and improve the economic mood--a thank you present for well-orchestrated government support to bring Niigata's governor and the financial institutions into line for the time being--or if it can actually be achieved (and, if so, whether it involves the same kind of accounting magic that limited the last two years' losses to 700 billion yen).
UPDATE: Reuters had a good article today (October 7, 2013) on the TEPCO turnaround effort -- the public relations and the reality. As one analyst indicates, "it's all kabuki ... It's very much an orchestrated presentation". I hope my blog post gives some sense of the way these things are done in Japan, at least at the public level.
Also the Yomiuri mentions that the LDP is now seriously considering a "good bank bad bank" approach to TEPCO, hiving off the legacy problem of decommissioning its reactors and dealing with the Fukushima mess. Since TEPCO does not have the resources to deal with its legacy issues, this is perhaps inevitable. But if and only if it is done in a manner that ensures the "good TEPCO" will move forward faithfully to implement a competitive market in electricity, including separation of generation, transmission and distribution.
No comments:
Post a Comment